As many companies reverse course on remote work and enforce return-to-office (RTO) mandates, one uncomfortable question is surfacing: is this about collaboration — or about contracts?
Despite proven productivity during the remote work boom, countless businesses are urging workers back to the office. But a growing number of employees, environmental advocates, and workplace analysts are pointing to another motive: commercial real estate.
Many corporations are locked into long-term leases or own expansive office buildings — expensive assets that don’t look good empty. But just because something is paid for, does that justify its use when it harms the planet?
Let’s break down the environmental, financial, and ethical costs of returning to the office — and ask what really makes business sustainable.
The Environmental Cost of Returning to the Office
1. Commuting Emissions
Bringing workers back means bringing back millions of cars, buses, and trains.
- Transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.
- Average car commuter emits about 4.6 metric tons of CO₂ annually
- Urban congestion increases pollution per mile, especially during peak hours
Even hybrid schedules multiply emissions compared to full remote work.
2. Energy Use in Office Buildings
Empty offices consume less — but not zero. Fully reactivating commercial spaces means:
- Higher HVAC use (heating and cooling)
- Constant lighting, even in non-occupied areas
- Elevator, server room, and cafeteria loads
According to the U.S. Department of Energy, commercial buildings account for nearly 16% of total U.S. energy use — and much of it is wasted.
3. Increased Waste
Return-to-office routines come with increased:
- Single-use packaging from lunch and snacks
- Paper waste from printing
- Disposable coffee cups, water bottles, and utensils
- Office renovation and retrofitting waste as companies “reopen” floors
Remote work drastically reduced these streams of daily waste.
What Role Does Real Estate Play?
1. Long-Term Leases and Owned Properties
Most corporate offices operate under 5- to 15-year leases — with millions committed regardless of occupancy. Empty buildings don’t generate ROI, and boards often pressure leadership to “justify” the expense.
This leads to mandates not rooted in productivity or collaboration — but in real estate sunk cost fallacy.
2. Stakeholder Optics
Public companies may fear how empty HQs appear to investors or clients. There’s pressure to “look active” or maintain prestige, especially with flagship office towers in major cities.
3. Local Economies and Politics
Some cities and landlords lobby large employers to return workers, fearing:
- Lost foot traffic for local businesses
- Falling commercial property values
- Declining tax revenues
While understandable, this places responsibility on corporations to “fill space” at environmental expense.
The Ethical Question: Paid For ≠ Sustainable
Just because something has been paid for — a lease, a building, an investment — does that mean it must be used?
This mindset mirrors other forms of waste:
- Fast fashion: “I bought it, I should wear it, even if it’s harmful.”
- Airline miles: “I earned the points, I should take the trip, even if unnecessary.”
- Corporate offices: “We signed the lease, we should fill the space.”
But climate logic — and basic ethics — suggests a different path.
We must ask:
- Are we reinforcing polluting systems just to avoid admitting sunk costs?
- Is it more wasteful to leave a building empty — or to fill it and waste energy, resources, and time in doing so?
Sustainability isn’t just about reducing emissions — it’s about challenging the systems that normalize excess and justify waste.
Benefits of Remote Work That Still Hold True
1. Carbon Reduction
A study from WSP found that two remote workdays per week reduced individual carbon footprints by up to 29%. Full-time remote workers had the lowest impact.
2. Time Efficiency
Remote workers save hours per week in commuting — time that can be reinvested into:
- Health and wellness
- Family or caregiving responsibilities
- Deep, focused work without office distractions
3. Economic Equity
Remote work reduces financial burdens for lower-income workers who may struggle with:
- Parking and transit costs
- Buying professional attire
- Eating out or managing childcare logistics
4. Accessibility and Inclusion
Remote work is more inclusive for:
- People with disabilities
- Parents and caregivers
- Workers in rural or underserved areas
Returning to office often reintroduces barriers, widening opportunity gaps.
Counterarguments: “But We Need Collaboration”
Yes — collaboration matters. But so does context:
- Distributed teams have been innovating for decades (open-source communities, remote-first startups)
- Collaboration doesn’t require physical presence — it requires intentional design
- Many in-office environments still operate via Zoom and Slack, even when physically present
Hybrid models can work — but forcing full RTO to justify leases masks economic interest as cultural necessity.
What Could Be Done Instead?
1. Repurpose Office Space
Unused office space could be converted into:
- Affordable housing
- Green coworking hubs
- Emergency climate shelters
- Urban gardens or learning centers
2. Be Honest in Sustainability Reports
Companies that push RTO should disclose:
- Environmental impact of increased travel
- Comparative emissions data pre- and post-RTO
- Whether return mandates were linked to real estate holdings
3. Compensate Flexibility With Planet-Conscious Incentives
If hybrid work is necessary, companies can:
- Provide public transit credits
- Subsidize e-bikes or carpool programs
- Offset office emissions with localized tree planting or renewable energy investment
Common Questions
Is it more eco-friendly to work from home?
Yes. Home energy use is typically far lower than the combined emissions of commuting and commercial building operation.
What if people want to return to the office?
That’s valid — the key is offering choice, not mandates. Forcing everyone back for non-collaborative roles negates environmental progress.
Is hybrid work a good compromise?
If designed well, yes. But it still has an environmental footprint, especially if commutes are long or infrequent collaboration is needed.
Are remote workers less productive?
Studies show mixed results, but most confirm equal or greater productivity, especially for knowledge workers. Burnout comes more from poor management than remote structure.
Why won’t companies admit RTO is about real estate?
Because it undermines their stated values of innovation, trust, and sustainability. But transparency could actually build employee trust and brand credibility.
Final Thoughts: A Moment of Truth for Corporate Sustainability
Return-to-office mandates reveal an inconvenient truth: sustainability often takes a backseat to sunk cost recovery and public image.
But it doesn’t have to be this way.
Rethinking business models for a climate-conscious world means letting go of outdated metrics — like office occupancy — and embracing new, human-centered ways of working.
We don’t need to fill buildings. We need to build better futures. And sometimes, that means letting go of what no longer serves — no matter how much it cost.
Reader Interactions