On September 19, 2025, the United States government announced a policy that stunned immigrants, employers, and advocates alike: a $100,000 fee on all new H-1B petitions filed from outside the country, effective September 21, 2025. Signed late Friday and set to take effect by Sunday, it left thousands scrambling to understand if they were affected, employers rushing to consult lawyers, and families sitting with the weight of uncertainty.
What looks like a bureaucratic change is in reality a price tag on human opportunity. This is not just about economics, or immigration paperwork, or visa categories. It’s about whether a nation chooses exclusion over civility, wealth over fairness, and division over solidarity at a time when unity has never been more urgent.
The Facts: What Changed and Who Is Affected
- The fee is one-time, not annual, but applies to each new petition.
- It affects new H-1B applications filed after the proclamation’s effective date.
- Renewals and extensions for current H-1B holders are not subject to the fee.
- Applicants already inside the U.S. on valid status are expected to be exempt, though “change of employer” petitions remain in a gray zone.
- Major companies advised workers to return to the U.S. before the deadline to avoid being caught outside.
This was not a debate in Congress. It was an executive proclamation — fast, sweeping, and immediate.
Why This Policy Is a Massive Setback
A Barrier to Talent and Fairness
The H-1B program was never perfect. It has been criticized for underpaying workers and for loopholes that favored corporations. But at its core, it has allowed skilled professionals — engineers, scientists, doctors, and educators — to contribute to American society. A $100,000 fee does not improve the system; it replaces merit with money.
Racial and Geographic Exclusion
Though the policy never uses the word race, the impact is unequal. Workers from India, Nigeria, Brazil, and other countries where wages and currencies are weaker face nearly impossible odds of qualifying. The rule effectively filters talent by wealth and geography — a racial and class barrier under the guise of immigration reform.
Loss of Civility
Society is held together not only by laws, but by shared principles of fairness, dignity, and mutual respect. When policy is wielded to make opportunity unreachable for those without wealth, it signals a collapse in civility. It sends the message that we no longer care to treat people with fairness, only with exclusion.
The Ripple Effects
Policies are not isolated. Like pebbles dropped into water, their impact expands far beyond their point of entry.
- Economic ripple: Employers in tech, healthcare, and research will face higher barriers to filling roles, potentially slowing innovation and competitiveness.
- Social ripple: Families who planned careers and lives in the U.S. are forced into painful decisions. Anxiety rises; trust falls.
- Global ripple: Other nations, from Canada to Germany to Singapore, are already opening doors to the same talent the U.S. is pushing away. Influence and leadership shift outward.
Small shifts create ripples, and this policy’s ripple is exclusionary.
How This Impacts the Planet
Immigration is often framed only in economic or political terms. But in a time of climate disruption, resource scarcity, and shared planetary risk, who gets to move and where they can go is an environmental issue, too.
- Climate migration is rising. Scientists project hundreds of millions of people may be displaced by climate impacts by mid-century. Closing borders with impossible price tags sets a precedent: that the wealthy will buy safety while the vulnerable are left behind.
- Innovation slows when talent is excluded. Many of the breakthroughs in renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and green technologies have come from immigrants. By shutting out global talent, we delay solutions that could help stabilize ecosystems.
- Division wastes resources. Building systems to exclude — walls, fees, bureaucratic hurdles — diverts energy and resources away from building solutions for shared planetary survival.
- One planet, divided futures. The earth does not care about national borders. Pollution, rising seas, wildfires, and biodiversity collapse cross all boundaries. When we divide people by wealth or origin, we also divide our ability to respond effectively to planetary crises.
The climate emergency requires global cooperation, not selective exclusion. Every time we draw a harsher line between who belongs and who does not, we weaken humanity’s ability to rise to the shared task of protecting the only home we have.
Beyond Policy: A Moral Failure
This moment is not only about economics. It is about morality.
To attach a six-figure price tag to a human’s chance at a better life is to say: You don’t belong unless you can pay. That is not leadership. That is gatekeeping by wealth.
It is a disappointment not only in a government decision, but in humanity itself.
- At a time when ecological systems strain under climate change, when global cooperation is essential, dividing people further is reckless.
- At a time when inequality tears at social fabrics, deliberately amplifying barriers is cruel.
- At a time when dignity is the one thing people should be able to count on, stripping it away sends a message of contempt.
We are not just residents of different lands. We are members of one planet. Division at this moment is not only unfair — it is unwise.
What’s Changed: The Bigger Picture
The proclamation signals more than a new fee. It signals a worldview: that borders matter more than shared survival, that wealth matters more than fairness, and that exclusion is preferable to cooperation.
This is not just immigration policy. It is a test of whether people will accept cruelty as normal.
FAQs
Does the $100,000 fee apply to current H-1B holders?
No. Renewals and extensions are not subject to the new fee.
Is the fee annual?
No. It is a one-time fee per new petition.
Who exactly is affected?
Applicants filing from outside the U.S. after the effective date. Those already inside the country on valid status are not expected to pay the fee, though “change of employer” cases are still unclear.
Why is the fee seen as discriminatory?
Because it disproportionately excludes workers from countries where wages and currencies make $100,000 unattainable — creating a de facto racial and geographic filter.
What can people do in response?
Seek legal guidance, push for advocacy, and most importantly: speak up. Silence in the face of exclusion normalizes injustice.
Final Thoughts
This is more than a line in the Federal Register. It is a choice about who we are.
To live on this planet in 2025 is to face cascading crises: climate instability, economic fragility, social division. At such a time, humanity needs bridges, not walls. We need civility, not cruelty. We need solidarity, not division.
Small hands signed this immigration policy. Big hands would have torn it up.
Let us be the big hands — the ones that refuse to fall in line with ideals of exclusion, the ones that believe fairness still matters, the ones that remember we share one fragile home.
Reader Interactions