Return to office (RTO) policies are often framed as progress — a return to “normal.” But if that normal includes gridlock traffic, energy-guzzling office buildings, and daily waste, we need to ask: progress toward what?
If companies are serious about climate action, RTO culture shouldn’t be the go-to solution. Because in practice, it’s often the opposite of sustainability.
The Greenwashed Office
It’s easy for companies to install a few LED lights, slap up some “eco-friendly” signage, and declare themselves green.
But if they’re simultaneously mandating thousands of employees commute five days a week, burn fuel, and consume resources at scale — those gestures don’t amount to real climate action.
What matters most isn’t the branding — it’s the footprint.
RTO Culture Ignores Proven Climate Gains
During the peak of remote work, we witnessed:
- Reduced air pollution in major cities
- Lower transportation emissions globally
- A drop in office-related energy use and waste
These weren’t minor effects. They were measurable improvements to air quality, carbon output, and daily resource usage.
Mandating a full return to office life erases those gains and reverts us to more extractive patterns — all in the name of “collaboration” that could happen over Zoom.
Commuting Isn’t Just Inconvenient — It’s a Climate Burden
Each daily commute adds:
- CO₂ emissions from vehicles
- Road congestion and fuel waste
- Wear-and-tear on infrastructure that requires energy and materials to maintain
In cities without strong public transit, workers have little choice but to drive. And most cars on the road are still gas-powered — meaning each trip adds to the problem.
Remote work removes that burden. Hybrid models reduce it. Full RTO? It multiplies it.
Energy Use: Office vs Home
In a home office:
- People heat or cool a smaller space
- Devices are used more efficiently
- Natural light and off-peak power use often reduce demand
In a corporate office:
- HVAC must cover large open areas
- Lighting systems run regardless of how many people are present
- Servers, screens, elevators, and infrastructure run all day
Unless offices are certified green buildings (and even then), the energy cost per worker is often significantly higher than at home.
The Waste Nobody Talks About
Corporate environments generate:
- Disposable cutlery, cups, wrappers, packaging
- Printouts, branded swag, outdated electronics
- Constant consumption of cleaning supplies and office materials
This daily waste rarely gets factored into sustainability metrics. Yet it adds up — fast.
Remote work minimizes these patterns. When people eat at home, work digitally, and skip branded clutter, they consume less. Period.
Rethinking Productivity and Presence
Many RTO mandates are justified with vague claims:
- “In-person builds culture”
- “We collaborate better face-to-face”
- “Remote workers aren’t as engaged”
But none of these statements are universally true — and none account for the environmental cost.
Climate action demands that we reassess not just how we work, but why we work the way we do. If culture depends on pollution, maybe it’s time for a new culture.
What Real Climate Action Looks Like
If companies want to back up their sustainability promises, they should:
- Offer permanent remote or hybrid options
- Invest in low-carbon remote infrastructure
- Encourage asynchronous work and digital-first practices
- Shift office spaces into shared community hubs, not daily destinations
- Support workers with stipends for home energy efficiency or public transit
These moves reduce emissions, waste, and burnout — while attracting talent and improving equity.
Final Thoughts: Don’t Confuse Visibility with Value
Just because someone is physically at a desk doesn’t mean they’re more productive, more committed, or more collaborative.
And just because a company opens the doors to its office doesn’t mean it’s doing anything meaningful for the planet.
RTO culture is easy to mandate. Real climate action takes courage — and a willingness to rethink old systems that no longer serve us.
Reader Interactions